TERMINATION
PAYMENTS AND TAX
Here we consider how specific kinds of termination
payment are treated for tax purposes in the light
of the statutory framework and relevant case law.
All references below, unless otherwise stated are
to the Income Tax (Earnings & Pensions) Act
2003 (ITEPA).
REDUNDANCY
PAYMENTS
Statutory Redundancy Payments made under the Employment
Rights Act 1996 (ERA) are specifically exempted
from general earnings under section 62 of the ITEPA
by S.309. However, such payments fall within S.401
and are chargeable to tax under that section, subject
to the £30,000 exemption. The maximum statutory
redundancy payment is well below the £30,000
exemption from which it follow that, unless the
value of other taxable elements of a termination
package cause the £30,000 limit to be exceeded,
statutory redundancy payments will usually be exempted
in full under S.403.
Similarly, a payment under a contractual redundancy
scheme will usually be tax-free so long as it
is less that £30,000. This is the result
of the House of Lord's decision in Mairs v. Haughey
1993 66 TC 273 that such a payment is not as an
emolument since it is not paid for service rendered
by rather as a means of compensating and employee
for not being able to continue to earn a living
from the former employment. The upshot is that
contractual redundancy payments are only taxable
under S.401 and as such attract the so-called
"golden-handshake" exemption.
The same is true of redundancy payments paid
out under a non-statutory scheme or arrangement.
Certain schemes provide payments to categories
of employee not covered by the statutory redundancy
provisions in the ERA. NHS employees employed
under the General Whitley Council conditions of
service are one example. The Revenue's policy
is to treat payments made on account of genuine
redundancies and paid out under such schemes or
arrangements as being akin to contractually enhanced
redundancy payments.
Ensuring accuracy in the labelling of redundancy
payments is crucial if the employee is to avoid
a demand for tax on a termination payment that
was thought to attract the golden handshake exemption.
One way to avoid mistakes is for employers to
utilise a procedure whereby they can obtain "clearance"
for lump-sum payments under contractual or non-statutory
redundancy schemes from their local tax office.
Such clearance ensures that redundancy payments
will be accepted as being liable to tax only under
S.401.
PAYMENTS
IN LIEU OF NOTICE
The phrase "payment in lieu of notice"
(PILON) is used to describe a range of payments
made in a variety of situations where the employee's
contract of employment is terminated and he or
she is compensated for the relevant period of
notice. In considering the taxation of such payments,
it is important to be clear on the circumstances
in which they are made.
CONTRACTUAL
PILONS
Contractual PILONS. Where an employee receives
a contractual PILON -i.e. where the contract expressly
provides that employment may be terminated by
the making of a PILON instead of actual notice
- the payment is chargeable to tax under S.62
as earnings from the employment.
GARDEN
LEAVE
Similar reasoning applies to any payment received
by an employee placed on "garden leave".
In this situation the employee will typically
be given proper notice of termination of employment
in accordance with the terms of the employment
contract but told not to attend work during the
notice period.
It is therefore subject to the same taxation
as normal salary payments.
NON-CONTRACTUAL
PILONS
One situation in which a PILON will not be regarded
as earnings from employment but as compensation
for loss of office is where there is no provision
for PILON in the contract. Where the employer
unilaterally dismisses the employee with less
, he has breached the contract of employment and
the PILON will be regarded as damages. Such damages
when paid on the termination of employment comprise
compensation for loss of office and therefore
fall within S.401, with the consequence that the
£30,000 general exemption applies.
AGREEMENTS
TO TERMINATE
Even in the absence of a contractual right to
terminate by giving a PILON, the employer and
employee may reach an agreement to terminate on
such a payment. So long as this is done only as
part of the process of termination, the payment
will not be regarded as deriving "from "
the employment but from the agreed terms for its
termination and so will be regarded as a damages
payment. In those circumstances the payment will
fall within S.401 even though no breach of contract
has occurred.
COMPROMISE
AGREEMENTS
When an employment terminates, employers often
seek to avoid potential claims by the employee,
such as unpaid salary, unfair dismissal or unlawful
discrimination. Often these claims are settled
out of court by the employer and the employee
reaching a compromise agreement. The effect of
a compromise agreement is to ensure that the employee
concerned cannot pursue his or her claims through
the civil courts or Employment Tribunals.
As the compromise agreement is separate from
the employment contract and deals only with the
termination of employment, it only gives rise
to payments and benefits within S. 401.
Nevertheless, there may well be elements included
in the compromise agreement that are chargeable
under other tax sections. Accordingly, it is necessary
to consider whether any contractual entitlements
have crystallised in order to see whether there
are any charges under sections other that S.401,
such as a contractual payment in lieu of notice.
Repayment clauses. The Inland Revenue has confirmed
that the existence of a repayment clause in a
compromise agreement will not normally mean that
payments made under the agreement are susceptible
to tax. Such clauses require the employee to repay
some or all of the agreed payment if he or she
subsequently litigates in respect of the employment.
LEGAL
COSTS
An employee may incur legal costs in pursuing
litigation to recover compensation for loss of
office. Such legal action may comprise, for example,
a county court claim for wrongful dismissal or
an employment tribunal claim for unfair dismissal.
Extra-statutory concession A81 provides that payments
of legal costs to an office-holder or employee
will receive special treatment in the following
circumstances:
where the legal dispute is settled without recourse
to the court/tribunal, no charge will be imposed
under S.401 on a payment made by the employer
directly to the employee's solicitor so long as
(i) the payment
is made pursuant to a specific term in a settlement
agreement, and (ii) the payment is in full or
partial discharge
of the solicitor's costs incurred solely in connection
with the termination of the employee's employment.
where the dispute proceeds to a court or tribunal,
no charge will be imposed on a payment of costs
made by
the employer, even if this is paid directly to
the employee, so long as the payment is made in
accordance with a
court or tribunal order.
For specific advice on Termination
Payments or Compromise Agreements, please contact
us directly on 0870 787 3688
or info@pinnaclepartnership.co.uk
|